Best Alternatives to Banned Dahua and Hikvision CCTV Systems

best alternatives to banned dahua and hikvision

In the United States, Hikvision and Dahua were recently added to a list of companies that are banned from selling surveillance equipment. The list was prepared by the United States End-User Committee, a group made up of representatives from various departments. Entities are added to or removed from the list with a majority vote. In addition to Dahua and Hikvision, the list also includes 26 other entities, including the Chinese government bureau of XUAR, 18 subordinate municipal and county public security bureaus, and one subordinate institute.

Dahua

Dahua and Hikvision have the reputation of producing some of the highest quality products. Both brands have a large user base and are often recommended for surveillance systems. However, despite their similar products, some differences exist.

Hikvision is owned by the Chinese government, and Dahua is a subsidiary of Dahua. Both companies have been accused of human rights abuses and a poor cybersecurity record, yet they are still allowed to rapidly expand throughout the world. This has led to concerns about the security of millions of people around the world.

Hikvision and Dahua are state-owned companies from China, but their presence on British streets is problematic. There are strong links between the two companies and the Chinese Communist Party. Both companies have significant stakes in the Chinese government. While UK fringe groups have sought a massive reduction in CCTV across the UK, they are more willing to lie and throw accusations to demonize Hikvision. However, their continued presence in the UK poses a real threat to the privacy of Western citizens, writes Greg Austin, senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

The largest cities in the world with the largest number of Dahua and Hikvision surveillance camera networks are New York and London, while the next biggest city in Europe is Romania, which is the ninth most populous country in the world. The number of Hikvision and Dahua networks in Montevideo, the sixth largest city in South America, is two and a half times higher than that of Bangkok and Ho Chi Minh City.

UK politicians have backed a campaign to ban surveillance cameras made by Chinese companies Hikvision and Dahua after a recent report linked their use with human rights abuses in China. Despite the criticism, privacy campaigners say that the UK government should be reviewing the use of surveillance technology in general. Among the group are Green MP Caroline Lucas, Lid Dem leader Sir Ed Davey and four former Conservative ministers.

Hikvision and Dahua are the two top CCTV manufacturers. Both are easy to install and use. Hikvision and Dahua IP cameras also have PoE solutions, which are plug-and-play.

Dahua and Hikvision IP cameras are comparable to Hikvision in terms of price and features. Although Hikvision is slightly cheaper, Dahua IP cameras feature more options and three price ranges. In addition to similar features, Dahua and Hikvision offer superior hardware and software.

Hikvision

Hikvision and Dahua are both state-owned Chinese companies that manufacture CCTV systems. Both companies have been banned in the UK, due to concerns about their use of surveillance technology, especially in China’s Xinjiang region, where the government is accused of detaining and torturing one million Uyghurs.

Hikvision cameras are much more advanced than their Dahua counterparts, and they have twice as many megabits per second. Both manufacturers also offer a mobile application that will allow you to set up and monitor your cameras through mobile devices. This will allow you to get notifications, stream video, and manage configuration from your phone.

While the cameras of Hikvision are not the biggest concern, it is the fact that the companies are owned by the Chinese government. Dahua and Hikvision are also banned in the US by the National Defense Authorization Act. Nonetheless, Hikvision is an excellent alternative to Dahua.

Since Dahua and Hikvision are banned in the United States, they are no longer available to federal employees and contractors. The ban, which honors late senator John McCain, prohibits federal agencies from purchasing or using these companies. This prohibition also extends to the companies that manufacture products for these companies. The law was passed in 2019 and will apply to the military, critical infrastructure, and other locations.

In the UK, Hikvision and Dahua cameras are used by more than 70% of local authorities. Almost 50% of police forces and 35% of schools use the technology. MPs and Lords from both parties are demanding a ban on these companies’ surveillance equipment. They want to make sure that all surveillance technology is reviewed before being used in the UK.

The main differences between the two companies’ cameras are their technical capabilities and night vision range. The former has a 50m night vision range, while the latter has 30m. Both cameras have fixed lenses and metal bodies. They are both IP67-rated and IK10 vandal-resistant. Both companies claim that their cameras meet UK laws.

While the Hikvision IP Camera DS-2CD2143G0-IS has the same resolution as the Dahua IPC-HDBW1431E, it offers three additional focal lengths. In addition, it has the same ONVIF compatibility and a full range of security features.

Huawei

Huawei has a long-standing reputation of producing quality products. This is especially true for its camera products. The company has also recently expanded into the 5G phone network in Britain. However, the UK government is currently drawing up proposals to ban Huawei equipment from the 5G network. Huawei is not happy about the British government’s decision, and has requested a meeting with UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson. However, if Johnson insists on banning Huawei, it will only anger Beijing and garner plaudits from President Donald .

The company has faced many entanglements with the U.S. government and has been accused of national security threats. The Chinese company was first identified as a national security threat in a Congressional report in 2012. The United Kingdom is also considering banning Huawei from its 5G network.

Hikvision is a Chinese state-owned company that still maintains close ties with the Chinese Communist Party. Its largest shareholder is the China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, a state-owned defense-industrial conglomerate that also makes lasers and washing machines. It was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2010 and in 2015, the Chinese government lent the company a $3 billion line of credit.

The ban on Huawei and ZTE’s equipment is a real concern. In order to protect the U.S. financial system and protect the United States economy, the FCC has proposed new restrictions on the sale of chips and other vital components to the company. This has led to intense lobbying by the technology industry. The FCC is accepting public comments on the new regulations until Feb. 3, 2019.

President Donald is expected to sign an executive order banning Chinese telecommunications gear. This could mean the end of Huawei equipment in U.S. networks. In the meantime, Huawei has been gearing up for extra security measures in the 5G network development. In fact, its Chief Security Officer, Andy Purdy, is preparing a lawsuit against the U.S. government for the ban.

The ban on Huawei is a bad thing for the United States, and it is hurting international relations. The continued controversies surrounding the company have ruined the trust between the U.S. and China. It is therefore important that the government avoid further sanctions on Huawei and other Chinese companies, especially in sensitive sectors.

There is a good chance that Hikvision will be the most severely sanctioned Chinese company. If that happens, this could have disastrous consequences for the company, but it will depend on the scope of the sanctions and the exemptions offered. The Biden administration should not just focus on Hikvision, but consider the strategic aims of AI sanctions. Similarly, it should consider whether any other major players can be added to the SDN list.